Text books can sometimes be important to a class and sometimes not depending on how the teacher utilizes in a textbook in their class. In Math, I rely heavily on the provided curriculum and texts and I think that is the result of my inexperience with math and math teaching. In the beginning of the year, I worked exclusively out of the provided text, and only recently have made a move away from the text, increasingly relying on my own devices. I’ve created many in-class packets over the past weeks to supplement the text and replace various sections.
I think part of the problem with textbooks is that oftentimes there is a disconnect between the needs of the class and the textbook. For example, the math textbook I presently use really fails to provide enough sample problems for students. It offers one or two basic problems, and then a handful of more complex problems, often leaving my students far behind. My students simply are not ready for those complex problems without more practice with the easier problems. In conclusion, I would argue that it is essential that it is the teacher who determines any class and not a textbook. A text is a teacher tool, but never can supersede the role of the teacher.
April 27, 2008 at 5:10 pm
When I was a teenager, which I admit was several years ago (he he) most math teachers taught “tricks” to help you solve the problems quickly and easily. This was totally meaningless and boring to me. Then about my third semester of algebra I was lucky to have “Teach” Davis, the legendary physics teacher as my math teacher. She had been teaching forever, since the twenties (this was the fifties), and was well beloved by everyone, especially the boys. “Teach” (yes we called her that!) didn’t teach tricks! She taught principles! Suddenly it all made sense! I made a C in her class, but it was the best math class I ever had. Every problem took a long time to solve because we never left a step out, but we understood how we got the answer!